The Student Loan Forgiveness Act: A Financial Paradox in Education

By: Christopher Tiske

Understanding the Student Loan Forgiveness Act

To fully understand the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, it is important to clarify its provisions. Under the new law, a former student or alumni will have their remaining student debt balance forgiven after making 10 years of consecutive payments while working full-time through a qualifying employer. After the qualifying monthly payments have been processed, student loan holders can apply for student loan forgiveness under an Income-Driven Repayment Plan (IDR) and have the rest of their remaining balance canceled.  However, the process requires borrowers to meet specific qualifications; it does not automatically erase student loan debt.

Qualifying fields of employment for the Student Loan Forgiveness Act

The Pros and Cons: What experts say about the Student Loan Forgiveness Act and its impact

According to experts, the long-term effects provide some positive, stimulating factors benefiting the United States economy, along with negative factors that emerge as well. One of the most positive benefits of the new law is that student loan debt relief could stimulate the economy by benefiting new business growth and lowering barriers to consumer spending. In short, student loan forgiveness may help boost the national economy by making it more affordable for borrowers to participate in the economy. The new law could also provide mental health and general health benefits to borrowers, such as less anxiety, depression, blood pressure, stronger immune systems, improved heart health, and self-esteem.

Of course, with pros come cons. Analysts declare that the forgiveness of student loans can increase resource consumption by several billion dollars each year for the next five to ten years. Where there comes opportunity, there involves consumption. If the economy stimulates itself at a pace too fast for sustainability, it could lead to a recession or inflation in products.

The warnings mentioned in the negative effects are balanced by the requirement that borrowers must complete 120 months (10 years) of payments under an IDR repayment plan through a qualifying company (taxable income/not strictly cash jobs). Overall, this makes the new law a more positive approach to individual health and business growth.

The most important part to understand is that the Student Loan Forgiveness Act does not just “erase” a student’s debt. The student would have to meet strict qualifications before requesting a null balance.

What the Public has to say

Interviewees: Hollie Wesoloski (Dartmouth Undergraduate / Brian and Carmel (Kewaunee, WI. Taxpayers)

It is quite astonishing how little the public understands about the Student Loan Forgiveness Act. Most individuals are under the impression that a student’s debt just automatically gets erased, unaware of the qualifications and requirements that need to be met to apply for debt relief. This widespread confusion fuels misconceptions about the future economic effects of debt relief and fosters negative assumptions.

Holly Wesoloski, a Dartmouth undergrad, agreed to do an interview, answering some general questions about the Student Loan Forgiveness Act. Regarding her thoughts about the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, Wesoloski said, “All I know is that it ‘erases’ a student’s debt (the common misconception of the public). Regarding her expectation of taxes in the future, she said, “I’d imagine it would impact negatively. It’s the taxpayers that are paying for it.”

After a brief explanation of the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, including the requirements and the length of payments needed to qualify, Wesoloskiwas visibly astonished. She said, “I have no idea the act had so many stipulations that were put in as a safeguard against economic backlash.”

At the close of the interview, Wesoloski was still skeptical but admitted that she did learn a lot about the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, and her viewpoint shifted a little. However, she did say that she would do some more “digging” on the subject to craft the final thoughts.

While considering the taxpayers of the United States, a married couple named Brian and Carmel agreed to answer “what they could” about the effects it may have on their future taxes and tax returns. Brian had worked for 25 years and is now retired, while his wife is still working and receiving partial retirement. Regarding their thoughts on the impact on their taxes, Brian said, “Well, the money has to come from somewhere. I’d imagine that it would affect some sort of public taxes.” He added, “All I know is that it better not affect my Social Security.”

After hearing a brief explanation of the qualifications required for the Student Loan Forgiveness Act, Carmel replied, “That’s what it is now. Wait a couple of years until they change everything about it like they do everything else.”

Home of taxpayers in Kewaunee, WI. (Brian and Carmel)

There wasn’t much to get in detail from the couple regarding the possible tax impact the Student Loan Forgiveness Act will have. However, it was apparent that they lacked sufficient information about how the Student Loan Forgiveness Act operates, including its finer details. This mirrors the average standpoint of the public perspective – an assumption followed by misinformation leading to generalized negative opinions about monetary government programs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *