Emancipation in Saint Domingue…What is that?

Photo from Wikimedia. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Toussaint_L’Ouverture.jpg

Between 1791-1802 blacks and mulattos in Saint Domingue struggled to become emancipated.  Slavery was always a controversial topic in Saint Domingue because some people wanted slavery, while others wanted to abolish it.  What was considered emancipation during this time period?  There were many thoughts of what emancipation actually was. Emancipation meant that their was no more slavery, people of color would have the same rights as whites, and slaves would be able to own their own land. Slaves thought that owning land was the key to their freedom.  But because slaves were seen as society’s lowest. At the time free people of color and gens de couleur had some rights.  They had basic rights but  they still weren’t allowed to participate in Saint Domingue’s political process. The fight for emancipation began in 1789 when the Declaration of Rights came out. Free blacks and Gens de couleur wanted the same rights as whites. Some of the free blacks and gens de couleur went ahead and created their own societies such as the Society of Friends with Blacks and Society of American Colonists. Through these organizations they rallied and listed their demands. Many of these groups drafted their own decrees saying that they wanted to be promoted under the same conditions as whites, have representation in the Assembly, and let black and mulattos serve in the government. By 1790, revolts started to break in Saint Domingue. Those who demanded rights were often executed.  The violence continued and slaves started to take part. Slaves would participate by attacking plantations and their owners. They wanted appropriated land and subsistence farms they could live on.  Plantation owners were surprised by these revolts because many of them believed that slaves were not smart enough to plan the revolts.   There was also fear that  slavery revolts would jump to neighboring islands that the British and Spanish owned. In February of 1793 Britain and Spain entered the war in Saint Domingue. The British and Spanish used tactics to get the slaves on their side. In May of 1793 provisions of the Code Noir were upheld.  The French agreed to have planation owners used less violence as well as receive more days off. The French used this tactic to try and lure slaves on to their side.  Many slave and slave leaders refused to join because of the arrival of the new Governor General Galbaud who was seen as very radical. In 1793 the Proclamation of Emancipation was issued. The decree stated that the principal of the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen would be applied to Saint Domingue and slaves would be free.  Even though the slaves were considered free, they were still forced to follow labor agreements and stay on the plantations and do the same work they did when they were slaves. They also had to follow and elaborate set of restrictions; for example having permission to leave the plantation. They only thing that truly changed with the 1793 Proclamation of Emancipation was how slaves were physically treated. Plantation owners were no longer allowed to physically whip the slaves. Slaves  however did not see this as emancipation  and continued to revolt. They still believed that could get a better deal. Also around this time, different areas of Saint Domingue were experiencing war. In the west the mulattos were for equality as well. Mulattos in a way were looking for emancipation but it was a different type. The mulattos were looking for having the opportunity to take part in Saint Domingue’s political process. In the North, Jean-Francois who was once a slave and became a maroon was able to negotiate with the French for amnesty for all slaves, improving conditions of slaves, and freedom for 50 leaders. In 1794 the Convention officially abolishes slavery in France and the French territories. With the abolishment of slavery, their was concern that the economy would no longer prosper. Because of this concern, right after the Decree of 1794 was put into effect, a new work code was created which made plantations owners give former slaves a third of the plantation revenue and an additional free day. Former slaves were still resisted against this and began to appropriate land for themselves. Even though slavery was officially abolished, the struggle would still continue for Saint Domingue. There was struggle to enforce the emancipation of slaves. The Constitution of Year III ensured that colonies would have the same laws as France and all people would be considered citizens. But their was still fear the slavery would return. Toussaint used  the Haitian Revolution to rise up. Toussaint would go on an make surethat all people would be considered citizens and the emancipation decree would be enforced. He did this by taking out his rivals such as Sonthonax and Laveaux by forcing them to represent Saint Domingue in the Council of 500.

Courtesy of Augustine.com http://augustine.com/images/jorge/Haitian_Revolution.jpg

 

 

Work Cited:

“The First Emancipation Proclamaton.” A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.

Geggus, David Patrick. “Doc. 21 Free People of Color Organize.” The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.

Geggus, David Patrick. “Doc. 25 The May 1791 Debates.” The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.

Geggus, David Patrick. “Doc. 37 The Slave Insurgents Make Demands.” The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. Print.

Effective Emancipation?

Real Emancipation.

Real Emancipation.

 Freed.

The emancipation of slaves in the territory of Haiti was similar in comparison to other country’s histories of freeing enslaved peoples throughout their independence or younger years of existence. Prior to the 1800s the idea of slavery and movement was not close to the emancipation process seen through the French and then the Haiti Revolution. And in fact, after this emancipation process and into the 1800s the idea of freeing slaves, allowing the different races similar freedoms and ending the slave trade in the Atlantic wouldn’t abruptly end or get resolved. So, the ultimate question is how actually would the slaves become Freed? A document, a speech or a governmental action can have a big meaning, but the effects of something such as emancipation in Haiti would take years of continuing struggle to fully stimulate the population majority. The struggles, the violence, the disorganization, the French influence changing would all play a role in the actual freedom of the former slaves in Haiti. The slaves became freed when the declaration for their emancipation came through, but were not freed until many years after that through the process and through the changing of scenery completely in Europe and the Americas.

Survival

It was referenced numerous times in passages in the Popkin readings for class that the blacks would have an almost impossible time surviving the newly proclaimed freedom the documents of emancipation gave them in Saint Domingue. Being emancipated wasn’t something would be adjusted to overnight. As history shows, any emancipation process takes years to really be recognizable, Saint Domingue was no different. The rights given on paper or the rights the former enslaved peoples were granted seemed adjustable, somewhat fair on paper. The rights that were really recognized were barely enough to allow blacks in Saint Domingue to survive. The struggle to obtain any land, have any public opinion, conduct trade or have personal freedoms would continue to be problems. On top of this, the violence and the revolution itself were from over when the emancipation took effect. So, to even feel any sort of real emancipation the former slaves would have to survive the harsh conditions and live past all the violence and power struggle that was going to continue for the next decade or so.

Comparison

The emancipation process most are familiar with would be the slaves in the United States and the Civil War. President Lincoln’s famous Emancipation Proclamation has been taught in primary and secondary history courses and was a very crucial moment in this country’s history. Obviously historians have written at long lengths about both of these processes, but for this class’s purpose it is important to note that the enslaved peoples both struggled for any real rights through the emancipation. In both Haiti and the United States violence, a battle for rights and a definition that only looked good on paper would be the primary theme for the black people. It would take nearly hundred years arguably for any major recognition and changes to occur for the blacks of the United States in their battle for real rights. The emancipation were intended to make races just, but the time and sacrifice needed after that proclamation would almost be as bad as a struggle than the enslaved period! Also, in both regions the former slaves would continue fleeing from their locations to new homelands in an attempt to escape the prejudice and violence, seeking a better quality of living. The image shown above is another example of how the former slaves looked to gain almost a feeling of revenge, but actual freedom by hanging the former masters and landowners that flexed their powers formerly on the slaves. Emancipation wasn’t going to happen overnight. The idea didn’t happen overnight, the process didn’t happen overnight and the consequences weren’t going to vanish overnight either.

Works Cited.

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. Print.

Geggus, David, ed. The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014. Print.

Image Used: library.brown.edu

Bargaining With Freedom

Emancipation in Saint Domingue was not a simple, or even consistent, process.  Throughout the tumultuous Haitian Revolution (1791-1804) promises of emancipation were offered from numerous angles.  Haitians were considered a valuable ally from a colonial perspective as the British, French, and Spanish all tried to increase their influence in the Caribbean.  Toussaint L’ouverture and Andre Rigaud, among other leaders, were forced to consider multiple offers of emancipation.  Ultimately, the path to emancipation proved more difficult than any could have imagined.

France’s own revolution must be addressed when examining the course of emancipation in Saint Domingue.  The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen sparked conversations about whether free men of color were privy to the same rights as free white men.  Vincent Oge, a prominent leader of the Society of the Friends of Blacks in France, incited a revolt through  mobilizing the gens de couleur.  Although the revolt was quickly put down the conversation could not be quenched; did the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen apply to free men in Saint Domingue, a French colony?

Saint Domingue first experienced emancipation when Civil Commissioner Sonthonax proclaimed freedom for slaves in the northern province of the island in 1793.  This “freedom” entailed severe restrictions, but it was nevertheless a beginning.  However, the conversation on freedom took an immediate turn when the French National Convention abolished slavery in France and all of its colonies.  Interestingly, some of the main opponents to the abolishment of slavery were gens de couleur.  Due to a caste mentality that had been enforced on the colony for decades, the free men of color likely did not appreciate watching blacks become their instant equals.  French emancipation swayed the armies of Toussaint L’ouverture, Jean-Jaques Dessalines, and Henri Christophe to join on the side of the French Republic against outside forces.  While Toussaint desired to maintain a relationship with France, the loyalties of former slaves were not sold on the French.

Prior to the National Convention’s emancipation of all slavery, a black rebellion had already begun.  Toussaint, who was quickly emerging as the unanimous leader of the rebellion, became engaged in negotiations with the Spanish.  The Spanish, who at the time held Santo Domingo, realized the fighting potential of Saint Domingue’s black population.  Emancipation was offered to Toussaint and his fighters if the black rebellion sided with the Spanish against their colonial enemies.  Emancipation became a bargaining chip to the colonial powers.  While some leaders wished to side with any power that would hurt the French, Toussaint was only interested in pursuing freedom for his fellow former slaves.  The Spanish realized that if Toussaint could be convinced of their desire to enact change, Toussaint’s disciplined forces would be on their side.

Toussaint remained committed to full abolition of slavery.  Following this paradigm he adopted the language of the French Revolution, specifically in striving for Liberty and Equality within Saint Domingue.  When word came that the French had officially decreed emancipation, and it was not merely a ruse by Sonthonax, Toussaint and his followers were quick to switch allegiance to the French.

The Island of Hispaniola. Home to present day Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

The Island of Hispaniola. 

With the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte in France, many feared that emancipation in the colonies would be revoked.  Initially this was not the case.  Napoleon continued the trend of using emancipation as a bargaining tool by agreeing to not re-introduce slavery if Toussaint would not invade Santo Domingo (If Toussaint were able to claim Santo Domingo and rally the slave there he would possess the entire island.  This would enable Toussaint and his followers to have incredible bargaining power with the European powers).

Emancipation proved to be the most powerful issue through the revolution.  In addition to instigating action, concern over emancipation also reigned in the radical ideas of black leaders.  Toussaint’s constitution of 1801 established an autonomous, nearly sovereign nation.  However, Toussaint would not go far enough to declare independence, fearing such an action would cause a French response that may re-introduce slavery; to prevent misunderstanding, Article 1 of Toussaint’s constitution declared Saint Domingue as just a single colony of the French Empire.

Napoleon’s subsequent response and writings indicate his desire to regain control of the blacks in Saint Domingue.  Whether by force or negotiation, it is clear that all interactions between Napoleon and the island would have been self-serving.  Emancipation in Saint Domingue was constantly used as a bargaining tool to win the favor of blacks on the island.

 

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. Print.

Geggus, David, ed. The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014. Print.

Emancipation in Saint Domingue

Emancipation in Saint Domingue was a rocky road, with many decrees being said, then revoked later on. However, eventually the enslaved were freed, though what they could and could not do was limited. They could participate in civil society, but the former enslaved had to stay on the plantations that they worked during their time as a slave. They also were no longer allowed to be violently punished. But why 29 August 1793, after so long?
In 1793, the French were facing maBy http://maps.bpl.org [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commonsny issues both continentally and on the island. There was a deadlock in the legislative assembly, as well as a looming threat of invasion from Britain and Spain. In August 1793, Spain also proceeded with their plans for invasion of the island. There was also an increasing rate of rebellions on the island against the institution of slavery. Strong leaders such as Toussaint Louverture were emerging, and winning rebellions.
Because of the tensions France was facing with the other powerful Empires of the time, the French thought one way to limit the tensions in Saint Domingue would be to grant emancipation to enslaved men that joined their army, as well as their families (Colwill, 131). This was a great incentive for many enslaved, because though Britain and Spain were promising emancipation for the slave themselves, it did not include their families. However, though many did join the French Army, many were also weary to trust the French.
The French had to do something to broker some sort of peace and resolution, so before emancipation, they tried a few other strategies, such as the Second Civil Commission on 20 September 1792. The commission sent Sonothax and Etienne Polverel with 6,000 troops to San Domingue in hopes that they could enforce the April Decree, and end agitation for colonial autonomy. However, Sonothax was a known abolitionist, and because of Frances preoccupations, Sonothax and Polverel were able to overstep their bounds in governing the island. One of the ways that they did this was through their 11 July 1793 proclamation that stated any enslaved woman that married a freed man was free, and a few months later, on 29 August, emancipated everyone in the Northern part of the province (Colwill, 143).
However, one of the reasons that Sonothax may have emancipated the enslaved was to try and broker a sort of peace with them.

Burning of La Cap

There had been many uprising that were getting more extreme over the summer of 1793. In that June, the city of La Cap was burned by the rebellion, and forced many white colonists to flee to the United States (Gueggs, ch. 43). The increasing violence of the rebellion was not unsuspected. As Robespierre suggested, by the colony continually hindering rights of freed blacks, and grouping them more so with the enslaved, it would only cause violence and disruption (Gueggs, ch. 25). In fact, freed black men were often blamed for the slave revolts, further driving them away from the side of the white colonists, and towards the sympathy of the enslaved.
This could be seen a few years prior in the 16 August 1791 attack on plantations in the Northern part of Saint Domingue. Because white slaveholders did not think that the enslaved had the capacity to plan such an event, they blamed the freed blacks, and became fearful of them (Popkin, 36). This fear led to a lot of discrimination, and the whites began to strip free blacks of their rights. Because of this, even more insurrection spread throughout the colony.
Because of the growing disillusionment of both the freed blacks and the enslaved, by the end of August 1793, Sonothax felt that he had no choice other than emancipation to keep the support of the blacks in the colony (Popkin 59). He did so to try and preserve the plantation society that so many people in the world relied on while trying to keep peace. Because of this, the formerly enslaved were made to stay on their plantations while they would be given compensation for their work, and their masters were no longer allowed to torture or abuse them.

Citations:

Colwill, Elizabeth. “‘Fetes de L’Hymen, Fetes de la Liberte,’ Marriage, Manhood, and Emancipation in Revolutionary Saint-Domingue.” Journal of Haitian Studies 17.1 (2011): 125-53. PDF file.
Geggus, David, ed. The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014. Print.
“La Cap.” Wikipedia Commons. Wikipedia, n.d. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. <http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Frontispiece_from_the_book_Saint-Domingue,_ou_Histoire_de_Ses_R%C3%A9volutions._ca._1815.jpg>.
“Map.” Wikimedia Commons. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Apr. 2015. <By http://maps.bpl.org [CC BY 2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons>.
Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. Print.

Emancipation in Saint Domingue (Modern Day Haiti): The Rule of Toussaint Louverture

Emancipation in Saint Domingue (Modern Day Haiti): The Rule of Toussaint Louverture

File:Toussaint louverture.jpg

The events leading up to Haitian Independence in 1804 were full of deception, corruption, loyalty and disloyalty, the mass murder of peoples, and above all, a undeniable motivation to take control of the island by both sides. While some argue that the cause and success of the war in Haiti was due partly to the war between European powers, the war was essentially one between two peoples: the oppressors and the oppressed. Within this war, there were two prominent Haitian leaders, known as black insurgents, who fought for the emancipation of their nation, and eventually independence – Toussaint Louverture and Jean-Jacques Dessalines. While Toussaint is more widely known to the world as the leader of the Haitian revolution, Dessalines arguably equally, if not more, contributed to revolution; and, after Toussaint’s capture, Dessalines is the leader that ultimately led Haiti into independence. Although Dessalines’ path to independence was full of highly questionable and controversial tactics, he, and the indigenous army of St. Domingue, won back their full freedom and took control of their own nation. However, leading up to Dessalines’ takeover, Toussaint ran the colony in the most efficient way he thought possible during the years of emancipation.

In August 29 1793, Sonthonax, civil commissioner and advocate for emancipation, used his assumed power to free the enslaved stating, “The French Republic wants all men without distinction of color to be free and equal” (Geggus 107) . He did this largely to gain the support of the colony to defeat the Spanish army, which was also rallying black insurgents promising freedom. However, once the proclamation was enforced, the major black insurgents joined the French side of the army, defeating both the Spanish and the rebellious within the colony. During the eight year period that followed, the battle between the black insurgents, such as Toussaint and Dessalines, and the French army lessened. This was largely due to the combined forces of some black insurgents and the French army, working together to keep peace within the colony. After Sonthonax left the colony in 1797, Toussaint took the opportunity to run the colony as he saw fit, holding moderate power in 1798-1801. Toussaint took control as the official representative of France’s power within the colonies, while also continually advocating for the rights of the now emancipated people; he was more of a mediator between France and the colonies, making sure to stay loyal to both France and the colony.

Moreover, Toussaint used his power to enforce a strict system within the colony, following the details of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1793. Additionally, because of his loyalty to France and French policies, he despised the voodoo that some Haitians practiced and made Catholicism the colony’s only legal religion. Also, Toussaint enforced strict morality rules onto the citizens, both of color and not. Additionally, within the emancipation proclamation, Sonthonax made it clear that emancipation did not necessarily equate to the end of the current agricultural system in place. In Article 9 of the proclamation, it sates, “Slaves currently attached to the plantations of their former masters will be obliged to remain there and work the land” (Geggus 108) . Within this system, however, the workers will have minor benefits and the laws laid out in the Code Noir would also be enforced, meaning the workers would now have certain days off and more legal rights.

Lastly, even though the colony was now ruled by one of its own natives, Toussaint still ran into major issues during his authoritarian rule of the colony. Jeremy Popkin, author of A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution, states, “As [Toussaint] tried to create a powerful government capable of protecting the freedom of the black population, he found himself caught up in a series of conflicts with opponents who resented his authority” (Popkin 90) . Popkin goes on to cite Toussaint’s conflicts domestically; however, internationally, Toussaint would soon be facing larger issues with the French government, specifically Napoleon Bonaparte.

_____________________________________________________________

Sources:

“The Emancipation Proclamation of August 29 1793.” In The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History, edited by David Geggus, 107-108. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 2014.

“Toussaint Louverture in Power, 1798-1801.” In A Concise History of Haitian Revolution , by Jeremy D. Popkin, 90-113. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.

Picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toussaint_louverture.jpg

Emancipation as a Bribe

Sonthonax1793 was the year that emancipation was officially declared by Sonthonax on the island of Saint Domingue it was also the year that the Reign of Terror began in France. Some people think that there are no such things as coincidence and that there must be some explanation for why these two events happened so close together. I look at this and I think that for the most part they were a coincidence, yes the atmosphere in both places influenced the policy of the other but for the most part Sonthonax was acting independently of the French government. Sonthonax was sent by a French government that was fairly liberal and open to making some concessions to the people of Saint Domingue but that would soon change and the government would take a more conservative turn. Sonthonax though was unaware of that and since the rebels in Saint Domingue showed no signs of easing up he came to grant more and more concessions hoping to win them over to the side of the French instead of the British and Spanish who were also interfering at the time. Eventually he went as far as granting full emancipation and this is something the French government certainly would not have supported had they known about it as it was happening. The only effect that the Reign of Terror would have on the emancipation decree is that since the government was in disarray they did not hear about the decree for sometime and when they finally did the government had more important things to worry about which allowed the decree to pass without protest. This is why the timing of the emancipation decree was so important because if it had happened at the beginning of that summer France would have probably been able to react quickly and reverse the decision but due to all the upheaval at the time the enslaved people of Saint Domingue received their freedom.

This was a freedom with stipulations though which is something the people would have to put up with for many years to come. Sonthonax put into the decree a section that stated that the former enslaved people had to remain on the plantations and continue their work. They were to receive pay or a portion of the crop and could no longer be punished because they were not property but if 220px-Général_Toussaint_Louverturethey were not property then why could they not go off and make it on their own? The answer is that France and Sonthonax still wanted to reap all the benefits that came with possessing Saint Domingue and for that to happen plantations had to continue producing their crops. Emancipation did not actually mean freedom all it meant was that the French were currently the ones offering the best deal to the people of the island and if there had not been Spain and Britain to contend with than this emancipation decree would have never happened. It did though and for the most part the emancipation decree accomplished its goal because it convinced most of the rebels, like Toussaint, to switch over to the French side. Once this had happened the French were able to deal with the Spanish, British, and those islanders who were still revolting of who there were few at this point. When looked at in this way the emancipation decree amounted to nothing more than a war tactic that was used in the spur of the moment and in actuality had no official backing for about the first three months of its existence. The decree also helped to set up a precedence for how freedom on the island of Saint Domingue would function. The fact that it included the work order stipulation it set up a model for future decrees and declarations which would also include a similar announcement. This can be seen in the works of Toussaint and how he continued to insist that works stay and work in order to maintain a stable economy.

Citations

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the French Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012

Geggus, David, ed. The Haitian Revolution: A documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014

Images

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toussaint_Louverture

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sonthonax.jpg

 

Was it Really Emancipation in Saint Domingue?

The Haitian Revolution was quite unique in the way that slavery was handled.  The nation of France in their own countryside was struggling to determine who should receive the full political rights.  If they were having struggles at home, how were they going to control their territories that are an ocean away?

It had been decided through the Declaration of the Rights of Man that all men are made equal.  This, in essence, would have made all of the enslaved men on Saint Domingue free.  Sonothax and Polverel had proclaimed that all men would be emancipated in 1793.  However, this was just the start of a struggle to enforce emancipation.  This was not an official decree because Sonothax hadn’t the power to free everyone.  The government and structure of the colony was in absolute chaos throughout the entire Haitian Revolution and it was inevitable that France would lose the territory; it was just a matter of time.

“Official” emancipation is not until they declare for their independence after pushing the French out of Saint Domingue.  Official is in quotations because of the obscurity of this entire situation.  Although the enslaved people had legally been free prior to independence, there was not a way to enforce it.  The colony had also been economically powerful because of their plantation-driven system. Without people to work the plantations, the production would stop, which would lead to a stop in trade and a slower economy.  There were still plenty of rebellions happening over time, but they still needed overseers to watch over plantations to keep economic growth stable.  The People of Saint Domingue never really gained all of their freedoms from emancipation until the new country of Haiti was created.

http://thelouvertureproject.org/images/5/5e/Louisiana_purchase_map.jpg

The Louisiana Territory is often regarded in American history as a bargain.  It is almost always looked at from the American perspective.  However, it really had much more world significance than people realize.  Yes, we know that Thomas Jefferson and Napoleon Bonaparte were the key individuals in orchestrating this exchange, but why was it so significant to Saint Domingue? There was a significant amount of pressure on Napoleon financially because of the raging wars with Britain and Spain in the European continent.  The colony of Saint Domingue was in absolute chaos.  It certainly seems like Napoleon was giving up on colonialism in the western hemisphere.  By selling the Louisiana Territory, he pulled out a French presence.  There would be no more reinforcements from Louisiana to help in the colony.  French imperialism in the western hemisphere was dead (at least while Napoleon was in power).

The concept of leadership and influential powers throughout the Haitian Revolution were quite strange.  Toussaint Louverture spent practically all of his time “leading the revolution” while he was in the French military, fighting for France, whether it was against the Spanish or the British.  He had gained control of thousands of troops over his time and would eventually use them to rebel and fight off the French.  These military revolts made fighting seem like a civil war.  Both General Leclerc’s army and Toussaint’s army sang the same revolutionary songs, but they were fighting each other for control of the same territory.  Eventually, Toussaint would surrender to Leclerc and he would be sent to prison in France, where he later died.

Another revolutionary leader was Jean-Jacques Dessalines, who also happened to be in the same situation as Toussaint.  He was fighting for the French and rebelled against them in the same battles as Toussaint.  He also surrendered to Leclerc, but he was not seen as a big of a threat as Toussaint.  This changed the course of what emancipation would look like.

http://www.sfbayview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Haiti-revolution-Battle-of-Vertieres-1803-won-by-Gen.-Jean-Jacques-Dessalines.jpg

Dessalines was a much more violent man than Toussaint.  He led more viciously, while Toussaint would have been more diplomatic.  After the French had finally surrendered to Dessalines, he wanted to rid the colony of whites.  Could this be considered genocide?  Dessalines was deliberately focusing on the white people, and massacring them.  This is really interesting because it seems like a very different vision from Toussaint.  There was the belief that the plantation system should exist, and overseers could still exist, and they could still be white, but the cultivateurs would be paid for their labor. Some, like Dessalines, would argue that this is still a system of slavery.  Others, like Toussaint, would think that it was just a colony reaching its potential economically. This debate could continue indefinitely.

The people of Saint Domingue would eventually be the people of Haiti.  Their awkward fight for emancipation was never clear until the country declared their independence.  There are many situations in which the revolution could have gone a different direction; the most important being the final revolutionary leader.  If Dessalines had been put into prison instead of Toussaint, how would Haiti look today?

References:

Dubois, Laurent. Haiti: The Aftershocks of History. New York: Metropolitan, 2012. Ebook.

Geggus, David. The Haitian Revolution. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2014. Ebook.

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the French Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. Ebook.

The Emancipation in Saint-Domingue

The Haitian Revolution was a time of war, celebrations, sacrifices, and heroism.  It marked a pivotal moment in the history of the Americas.  This revolution was the first time slavery became abolished in a society made primarily of slaves.  Not only was slavery abolished, but it was a result of a slave rebellion.  There was a great amount of focus and debate on this colony because there were large sums of money involved.  With the amount of exports the colony could produce, there was the potential of great wealth.  The colonial system allowed the wealth to be accumulated, but only by the white plantation and slave owners, which were the minority of the colony. Slavery was in affect for that purpose, and worked well, until the end of the eighteenth century.  As Geggus points out in article 46, Abolitionist Reaction to the Slave Insurrection, “White colonists…who have large properties and who owe little because they control their expenditure…love France; they are loyal and obedient to its laws, because they feel they need it to keep order and to protect their property.” (Geggus 103)

In 1791, the white population held most of the power politically and militarily.  They may have not been the majority of the population, but they had control.  After outbreaks of war and dramatic events for two years, the emancipation of Saint-Domingue’s slaves happened in August of 1793.  By this time, most of the white population left, or even fled, the island due to it being so unstable and unsafe.  As Jeremy D. Popkin states, “Between 1793 and 1798, the violence in Saint-Domingue gradually subsided and a new society, from which slavery had been officially banished and in which people of all colors enjoyed the same legal rights, started to take shape.”  (Popkin 62)  With the lack of white presence, free men of color now rose to high positions in the French army.  These new roles in the military allowed them to also have political power.

Sonthonax Proclamation Abolishing Slavery

Sonthonax Proclamation Abolishing Slavery

Now that all men had equal legal rights in Saint-Domingue, regardless of color, more problems arose.  The colony was not only going through a period of internal struggles and conflict, but was now a hot spot for international conflict.  Saint-Domingue was ruled primarily by men of color.  France’s government seemed to be content with allowing people, other than white people, to govern its most valuable colony.  It was now other countries who weren’t as accepting of this idea.  Primarily Britain, Spain, and the Americas struggled with this concept.  They feared that the news and outcomes of Saint-Domingue’s revolts would spread to their own territories and cause similar issues.  France, in the midst of a revolution, was still protecting its colony from these other countries.  “An army largely composed of soldiers of African descent, fighting under the French colors, defeated the foes – the forces of the black insurrection, the Spanish and the British – who had nearly overrun the colony in 1793.”  (Popkin 62-63)

After the emancipation in 1793, the new order that took place seemed to be a shaky one at best.  The new governing elite that had come about in Saint-Domingue were military officers from the insurrections and movements against white rule.  They all agreed and supported the abolition of slavery.  However, they still believed that the success of the colony depended on the fundamentals of the plantation system that created the colony’s wealth in the first place.  The French government was also determined to return the colony back to its original function of growing valuable crops for them.  To most of the people of color, reinstating plantation systems seemed too much like slavery.  Both the new military officers as well as the French government struggled in gaining support of the perks of the plantation system.  As Popkin points out, the tides began to turn in Saint-Domingue.  “Desperate as the situation in Saint-Domingue appeared in late 1793, events gradually began to turn in favor of the French cause and the implementation of emancipation.”  (Popkin 65)

 

References:

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the French Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012

Geggus, David. The Haitian Revolution: A Documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014

Picture from: thelouvertureproject.org/index.php?title=File:Sonthonax_proclamation.gif

Emancipation in Saint Domingue

The Haitian Revolution (1791-1804)

Many people believe that the Haitian Revolution was the sucessful slave revolt in history and to establish an independent country called Republic of Haiti today. The colonial system of slavery had been successfully functioning until a violent slave revolt in 1791. After the slave uprising in French colony of Saint- Domingue, this event news of insurrection in Saint- domingue spread quickly across the Atlantic world and overturn plantation economy.  Haitian revolution brought mass moblization  and France declared war with Britian and Spain over Saint- Domingue and leader’s commited to full emancipation.

Saint- Domingue had been known for fastest-growing and wealthiest in new world colonies. Saint- Domingue produces sugar, coffee, and cotton which generate to the French. It was also known as a place for rooted slave and the level of wealth was based on human capital. The demographic was important during the  Haitian revolution which was that majority of people in Haiti were African but they speak different language, have different political ideologies and religion. The way of colonical system of slavery in Saint- Domingue was crucial because tortures to slaves were horrible and human life was little value under the French colonial regime. There was time when Africans slave decided to no longer to be slaves and hope to became free. Many slaves attacked and killed their masters and burned plantation and houses.

The most influential and revolutionary leader was Tourssaint Louverture. He was considerd as privileged slave and had responsible to make abolished slavery. He was charismatic and encourgaed to the process the emancipation in Saint- Domingue. He mainly explained the situation to people and he mobilized the masses and told them what they think they should do. It seems like he had great respect from his fellowers and he proclaimed that he would brought freedom in this island. The slave revolt given fear througout to slave owners and overthrow the system of slavery was terrified for them. At the same time, it was good source of inspiration to  Africans slave and encouraged to emancipation. A Large number of  group of Afrian slaves who claimed thieir own freedom and racial  eqaulity. Some free colored had been granted eqaulity but many people did not have same eqaulity as whites.  They sought courage and determination helps to unite many different African ethnic group and became collective action to against to slavery anf fight for their own freedom.The French National  assembly sent second civil commission to save the French colony and maintain social order in Saint- Domingue and insure the enforcement of the April 4th decree.  One of commissioner Leger Felicite Sonthonax arrived in Saint- Domingue in 1972. He bagan to alliance to the free man of color and insure their citizenship. In 1793, French declared war with Britan and Spain, France had faced invasion from them. Toussaint Louverture joined Spainsh side to against the France.The Cvil commisionar attemted to hired the slave insurgent who defend the France  which offered freedom to them. At the same time,  Many people prefered to join in the Spanish side. So Sothonax decided to grant  slaves to freedom in the North Province. ” The emancipation proclamation of 29 August 1793 applied only to the devastated North Province at first, but it was quickly extended to the rest of  Saint- Domingue, where planter were welcoming Spainsh and British invaders” (Geggus, pp. 99).  However, Slaves were changed called ” laborers” in the colony  Theier daily live did not change at all and they were still restricted by government. In 1704, the French National convention in Paris approved abolished slavery all its colonies.

Napoleon’s seizure of power in 1799 represented a triumph for pragmatists who  had little concern for liberty and  were more interested in expanding France’s power by building up a strong government” ( Popkin pp. 114). Toussaint Louverture proclaimed the Saint – Domingue constitution  and proclaimed the abolition of slavery in 1801. He proclaimed that he would promised to full rights to them.  The consitution sent to France, but Saint- Domigue still indentified as a French colony. Nepoleon believes that it is not formal declaration of independence and he refused and reimposed slavery.In 1804, Dessaline  proclaimed Haiti’s independence.imagesAC5ZQOHL

 

Reference

1) Jeremy D. Popkin, A Concise History of The Haitian Revolution

2) David Geggus, The Haitian Revolution

3) http://library.brown.edu/haitihistory/10.html

 

imagesE0UZ4EZ7images

 

 

France’s Approach to the Emancipation of Peoples in Saint Domingue

The concept of emancipation in Saint Domingue was an ideal that was not truly something the French wished1736 to address in the early 1790’s. France was ardently defending its borders in Europe and were attempting to maintain control of its tributaries that were spread throughout the world. The most sought after goods were being created in the Caribbean and the most successful was the island of Saint Domingue which was a French territory.

To distinguish the fact that hostilities were high due to the sheer statistics on peoples living in Saint Domingue, Popkin uses eyewitness accounts to indicate that there was an immense amount of hostility between whites, mulattoes and peoples of African descent, the utilization of an eyewitness account helps the audience differentiate what could be thought of as hearsay against actual factual statements. The accounts distinctly indicate massive amounts of deaths that occurred in August of 1791 which precedes the decrees of emancipation which shows that hostilities existed and were paramount in the eventual emancipation which was a precursor to Saint Domingue’s independence from France (Popkin, 49).

As the isle of Saint Domingue was under French rule, three delegates were sent to initiate and ultimately establish laws that were created in France and implement these laws unto the colony. The most influential individual that undertook this voyage was Leger Felicite Sonthonax who arrived in Saint Domingue in 1792 where he was, initially, supposed to reinforce the April 4th decree that was approved by the National Assembly and to uphold the Code Noir. This decree that Sonthonax was supposed to enforce was the first initial decree that was set forth that provided citizenship to free men of color that owned property in the colony. Upon his arrival, Sonthonax sought out these men and created alliances with them which helped promote them as prominent members of society.

Although, seemingly successful at first, Sonthonax had to readdress the concept of freedom on the isle of Saint Domingue as the news of the conflicts in Europe increased in 1792 into 1793, because these issues surpassed the borders of Europe and proceeded to infiltrate the colonies ruled by Europe. Due to the increase in hostilities amongst the British, Spanish and the French Sonthonax did everything in his power to st_domingue_procattempt to keep control over the colony of Saint Domingue. The French commissioners’ decree of July 11, 1793 stimulated combatants whom were fighting for the Republic of France to unshackle the bonds of slavery from their families by getting married (Colwill, 126). By releasing the July decree, Sonthonax was attempting to depict an entrancing soliloquy that would rally supporters that inhabited the island to take up the fight for France.

“In early December 1793, Citoyen Robquin, devoted associate of Commissioner Sonthonax and captain in the 92nd regiment of the French infantry, sent his father news of the “most beautiful gift” that revolutionary France had granted Saint-Domingue: general emancipation. Robquin’s construction of liberty as a gift spoke volumes, for it ascribed to the French a beneficence that incurred obligations, specifically the obligation of former slaves to serve in the French military and on colonial plantations” (Colwill, 125). The idea that by fighting for France against the British and the Spanish that were threatening the island did seem to work for a small majority of people but overall, it really was not as successful as Sonthonax was hoping for.

As Saint Domingue was threatened from all sides, it appeared that there would be no help from France in protecting the colony, not only did Sonthonax have to attempt to remain in control of the colony from invading forces, he also had to contend with rising figureheads Toussaint, Jean-Francois and Biassou all of whom had amassed well-armed, well-trained armies throughout Saint Domingue. On August 29, 1793 Sonthonax singly announced the emancipation of slavery in Saint Domingue. After the Emancipation decree emanates and spreads throughout the colony, it basically was a grasp for those who had previously been slaves to take up arms to defend what is now seen as their homeland.

Toussaint eventually returned to the side of the French after this proclamation spread throughout the colony in late 1793 though it is unclear absolutely why he decided to go back to the side of the French but speculation suggests that since he was fighting for emancipation, it could have been a deciding factor for his return. The use of decrees that slowly emancipated the peoples of Saint Domingue were all predominantly associated with bringing these people forward to fight in a war that was trying to maintain Saint Domingue as a colony of France. Ultimately, the emancipation for the peoples of Saint Domingue had been won over years of sacrifice to protect the colony from those who sought to maintain control from Europe.

 

Works Cited

Colwill, Elizabeth. “‘Fetes de L’ Hymen, Fetes de la Liberte, ‘Marriage, Manhood, and Emancipation in Revolutionary Saint- Domingue” in Geggus nd Fiering, eds., The World of the Haitian Revolution (Bloomington: Indiana Uni. Press, 2009). 125-126.

Dubois, Laurent. Haiti: The Aftershocks of History. 1st ed. Vol. 1. New York: Metropolitan, 2012. Print.

Map of French Colonies in the Caribbean. Digital image. The French Revolution Begins 1788—1790. Web.

Polverel, Etienne, and Léger Félicité Sonthonax. Saint-Domingue. Commissaires Nationaux-Civils Etienne Polverel (1738-1794) Léger Félicité, Sonthonax (1763-1813). Digital image. Proclaiming Emancipation. 11 July 1793. Web.

Popkin, Jeremy D. “The First Days of the Slave Insurrection.” Facing Racial Revolution: Eyewitness Accounts of the Haitian Insurrection. Chicago: U of Chicago, 2007. 49. Print.

 

The Long Fight For Emancipation

Emancipation in Saint Domingue 

https://www.google.com/search?q=Emancipation%20of%20Saint-Domingue&hl=en&gws_rd=ssl&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=hPg7Vc3-EoazggS7_4HoAw#imgrc=Ls7YnDtHGS_VOM%253A%3BlqVdSL9iPtBLXM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.lalley.com%252Fhaiti1789.gif%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.lalley.com%252Fhaiti.htm%3B463%3B230

Picture of Saint-Domingue

In August of 1793, Sonthonax granted Gens de couleur and the Slaves emancipation in Saint- Domingue.

https://www.google.com/search?q=Emancipation%20of%20Saint-Domingue&hl=en&gws_rd=ssl&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=hPg7Vc3-EoazggS7_4HoAw#imgrc=_oF1of3LoRbW_M%253A%3BBgXXdw3hxwYalM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252F40.media.tumblr.com%252F188fccc405e49e7af5129fa6d7131d85%252Ftumblr_nb2lgwvzqR1smf838o1_r3_500.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fhaitianhistory.tumblr.com%252Fpost%252F96092067928%252Ftoday-in-haitian-history-august-29-1793%3B500%3B687

This is a picture of the Emancipation Proclamation

This decree was a very radical and pivotal moment in history, especially in the Americas. It was important because it was the first colony to abolish slavery, causing many other slave holding colonies to fear that it would put the idea of freedom into their slaves’ heads, possibly leading them to rebel. The road to emancipation started in 1792 when the King of France backed Jacques Pierre Brissot and signed a decree issuing the free gens de couleur full political and civil rights.  Not long after, Sonthonax and Polverel arrived in Saint- Domingue. Their job was to help enforce the decree granting these people their rights, deal with counter revolutionaries, and defeat the uprising. Both of these men were advocates of giving the gens de couleur their rights.

In 1793 Sonthonax and Polverel took steps to ally with the gens de couleur. Elizabeth Cowill states in ‘Fetes de L’ Hymen, Fetes de la Liberte, ‘Marriage, Manhood, and Emancipation in Revolutionary Saint- Domingue’, “discovering the ways in which the process of emancipation in Saint-Domingue involved a ritual struggle in which the rights and duties of man were fought and secured through military service and, equally important, republican marriage” (Conwill, pg. 126). It was a struggle to gain emancipation because it did not come free. The two commissioners attempted to appeal to the slaves by upholding the code noir and then later promising, through the June 1793 decree, that if they joined the military and fought with the French, they would be free and if they married a slave woman she also would be free. The two commissioners were worried about completely losing the colony, so they also decreed that if one married according to French law, the entire family would be freed. The two commissioners in return expected the newly emancipated slaves to fight for France and defend the colony of Saint Domingue from the insurgents.

Later in June of 1793 Spain invaded Saint- Domingue. Sonthonax reacted to this by abolishing slavery in the North Province and Polverel followed suit not long after by abolishing slavery in the Southern and Western Provinces. According to Jeremy D. Popkin, the author of, “A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution”, Sonthonax and Polverel used this as an attempt to, “preserve the colony of Saint- Domingue for the French Republic” (Chapter 3, A Republican Colony of Free Men). The two civil commissioners were trying to save the colony from the Spanish invaders. The emancipation occurred when it did, because Britain and Spain both entered in a war with France in February of 1793 and were welcomed by the white French settlers. The commissioners, seeing this threat and needing to crush it, allied with the gens de couleur and slaves by offering them emancipation if they joined the army. Once the threat became more significant, Sonthonax reacted by granting emancipation to the Northern Provinces knowing full well he needed their help to crush the invasion.

Through the emancipation, Sonthonax hoped to “preserve the plantation economy… proposed to replace slavery and the whip with remunerated forced labor and lighter forms of corporal punishment” (Geggus, Slave Emancipation Introduction). Sonthonax knew that France relied heavily on the Haitian economy and knew that France would be greatly impacted by the loss of it. Document 48) The Emancipation Proclamation of 29 August 1793, article 9 declared that, “ Slaves currently attached to the plantations of their masters will be obliged to remain there and to work the land..” (Geggus). So even though the gens de couleur were now citizens and could participate in politics, they were still attached to the land of their old masters and were more now like a serf rather than a slave. The proclamation was enforced through the new uses of punishment. Article 27 states,

“Punishment by whipping is absolutely forbidden and will be replaced, for problems of disobedience, by one to three days in the stocks as necessary. The strongest punishment will be the loss of a part or the entirety of the salary. It will be imposed by the justice of the peace and assessors” (Geggus).

The gens de couleur would be punished if they disobeyed the owner or the over seers. They were also punished by being put in jail if they did not own land, were not in the military, or employed. Using these punishments helped the leaders enforce the proclamation because the gens de courleur did not want to risk losing their new found freedom.

The Emancipation however, was very limited. Emancipation was only offered to those in the Southern, Western, and Northern provinces under Sonthonax and Polverel. The areas occupied by Spain and Britain were not freed either because the two countries still supported slavery. The decree was also only limited to men and not to the women unless they married a man who was free or in the army. The gens de couleur were still made to live on plantations and still followed the slavery like system.

Even though Saint-Domingue was emancipated, it didn’t come without a price. The gens de couleur and ex-slaves still had to deal with the slavery like system and the insurgents who did not side with Sonthona and Polverel. Over the next couple years the people of Saint-Domingue had to continuously fight to keep their new found citizenship and protect the emancipation.

Citations

Popkin, Jeremy D. A Concise History of the French Revolution. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012

Geggus, David, ed. The Haitian Revolution: A documentary History. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2014

Colwill, Elizabeth. “‘Fetes de L’ Hymen, Fetes de la Liberte, ‘Marriage, Manhood, and Emancipation in Revolutionary Saint- Domingue” in Geggus nd Fiering, eds., The World of the Haitian Revolution (Bloomington: Indiana Uni. Press, 2009), 125-153

 

 

The Fight for Emancipation

The Haitian emancipation of enslaved black was both a political and violent upheaval. Free black, robbed of their civil rights that were seemingly granted on French mainland and slaves, collectively, came together to instill new principles into Haitian legislature. Africans in Saint- Domingue largely wanted civil and political rights, fair treatment from their white counterpart and compliance from plantation owners. However admirable intentions may have seemed they were grotesquely filled with vengeful spite and violence. Laurent Dubois illustrates a scene in November of 1791 as rebels approached the Gallifet plantations as “they had as their standard “the body of a white child impaled upon a stake.”[1] Serving as a symbol of what emancipation looked like in Saint Dominque, a white child on a stake was the terrible beginning of a worthwhile struggle.

After slaves had initiated violent revolts against white, the revolutionary transformation displayed social and political violence daily. Terror was a key component at the forefront of the revolution because many whites fled to Cap- Francicais, given the blacks an advantage. Whites who fled to Le Cap were angry and therefore, believed that all blacks and men of color should be killed. Popkin told the story of an anonymous individual that exposed the vengeance white men acted upon. He said that black men and women would be chained up and killed even if they were blameless. [2]Blacks sought revenge in comparable or worse way to the treatment they had received from white plantation owners. Even after the Code Noir was enacted, it was weakly enforced. Its purpose was to ensure that unnecessary physical violence was not put upon slaves. Masters did not comply to the terms of the Code Noir because the slaves were seen as their property to be dealt with as they saw fit. In addition, there was nearly no corrective action from France if a slave holder disobeyed the new policy. Therefore, when the slave revolt began in 1791, the unspoken purpose for many was to kill and torture the white and completely destroy their plantations.

The emancipation came in a timelier manner then it may have otherwise because of a quest from Great Britain and Spain to take over the colonies. This sparked conflict as Great Britain and Spain declared war on France. Since many of the black slaves had believed that the royalists held their best interests in higher regard, when Britain invaded Saint Domingue through Hispaniola an alliance was made. The combined forces enabled the insurgents to commit further acts of violence. France recognized that it make supplemental changes to its legislation in order to restore peace to Saint Domingue and solidify France’s claim to it once more.

DuBois stated that Bryan Edwards, who went to Saint Dominque after the uprising, detail his experience as a ‘“picture of human misery” that “no other country, no former age, has exhibited”’[3]. The nearly 100,000 black had been reduced to half and 24,000 of the previously standing 40,000 were left. However, the 50,000 blacks that survived the revolution were finally emancipated.[4] The cost of freedom in Saint Domingue was detrimental but without brute force change would not have been readily granted. They could cast off a lifetime of white oppression and begin to rebuild themselves as men with civil liberties the same as any other man.

“If, because some blacks have committed cruelties, it can be deduced that all blacks are cruel”  stated Toussaint Louverture in 1797, “then it would be right to accuse of barbarity the European French and all that nation of the world”(5).Revolution looks different in every nation that has experienced it. Racism that was deeply imbedded in white culture had to be eradicated before progress could be made. In Saint Domingue violence illustrated the approach to emancipation after other hope failed.

[1] Dubois, L. (2011) Haiti: The Aftershocks of History. 1

[2] Popkin, J. (2012). Facing Racial Revolution. 50

[3] Dubois, L. (2011) Haiti: The Aftershocks of History. 3

[4] HAITIAN REVOLUTION. (2010)  HAITIAN REVOLUTION. Union for National Reconciliation and Defense of Human Rights

http://modmobilian.com/uploads/2010/02/haiti.jpg

 

 

Weeding the Field

 

 

 

 

image004

 

 

“I told you to weed the field,” wrote Toussaint Louverture, “but you tore everything out by the roots”(Popkin, 97). With the brutality of the ‘war of the knives, the deaths of thousands of people, with divided support two men survive and direct a war; both are the champions of emancipation but with ideologically different interpretations. This is an evident indicator of the magnitude and complexity lingering in the air of St. Domingue in 1799. The bubbling of rumors, changing leadership, the constant presence of a military state, a constant threat of colonial power and the conflicting legislation had all lead to a turbulent environment for the people of St. Domingue.

As an incredibly fertile and productive region for resources such as sugar, coffee, cotton and indigo, St. Domingue was considered very valuable which created multiple layers of hostility and envy among the hierarchy of civilians, an influx of those who were continually trafficked into the country as slaves and even those outside governments. Considering the demographics of the slave population when compared to the colonialists, the demand for freedom and equality was unavoidable. Fear of revolt loomed in the air and legitimate paranoia consumed the French population for nearly forty years, after all, as demand for goods increased, they had more than tripled the amount of peoples trafficked by repulsive methods into St. Domingue, mainly Congolese. As a response to the imbalance of slaves, mixed race people and white French people, a colony that was once considered somewhat mildly oppressive, began to enact disturbingly prejudicial laws in attempt to maintain control as the mistrust swelled. But the inhabitants had become intolerant of these violent ways and as generations passed and became more interracial, these measures were even more difficult to enact and more adamantly condemned by the general populous.

Although the debate for and against exploitation had been occurring since the arrival of colonists on the island of what is now Haiti, it’s debatable what exactly fortified the action on the part of the slave population to start demanding an end to slavery. Perhaps the repeated rejection of proposals of inclusion and basic rights that free black men such as Vincent Oge and Sonthonax’s had continually advocated for. Increased violence and loss of French control may have played a role in the eventual uprisings. Revolts in 1970 that were a response to vicious treatment of slaves and mixed race people lead to the extermination of many activists of emancipation, and action which was meant to enforce distress and generate compliance in the slave population may have lead to the unintended outcome of more vehement arguments and actions for civil liberties for the people of St. Domingue.

While we have indicators of the growing dissatisfied attitudes on multiple sides, we know that the first move towards lawful emancipation was through the Decree of May 15th, which granted rights to those who were born to free black individuals. Unfortunately, this may have not been a step into the direction of liberation for the individuals on the island of St. Domingue. This proclamation of emancipation was debatably a farce, considering that is was not truly enacted, possibly out of misinformation or intentionality on the part of leadership. Additionally, this decree was reversed within months. By September 1791, these back and fourth events generated even more suspicion and division across the entire colony.

After more instability across the islands, it seemed like every resurrection movement had different goals. In spite of the desires of the slave population, many military leaders such as Jean-Francois opted to negotiate with the French for amnesty and improved conditions for slaves, but this notion was again, rejected. After this point, some insurgents begin to partner with Britain and/or, another invading colonial power, in hopes that they would be granted emancipation.
With the realization that France may lose territory to their British and Spanish rivals through their unwillingness, the National Convention finally contends to abolish slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation of 1793. Sonthonax, out of desperation chose to grant freedom to those in the North Province, however, “the freedom offered the slaves was only sharing quasi-serfdom that kept most of them attached to the plantations and denied their own aspirations to become independent small farmer” (Greggus, pp. 107)

I think that fundamentally, the arguments that supported liberation of the slave population and those, which forewarned the fall of the economy took too long. Simply put, this process of providing half rights, creating proclamations and then rescinding, civil rights in disguise, rights for some and not others created too heavily a divide to satiate the people of St. Dominque. Colonialism from all of the European countries played games through lies and rumors to gain power, leaving the slave population in a state of confusion of who to trust and what direction to move, with the ever present trepidation of making a wrong decision with something as important as freedom on the line. Arguably, it’s even a contentious topic to attempt to understand the desires of those in leadership.
By the 1801 Proclamation, slavery was forever abolished, yet the hierarchy remained which still prevented true freedom and even this declaration was sparsely enforced and continually under attack. Again, in 1804, Dessaline’s Proclamation promised the same liberties, but this time, he abolished European presence on the island, yet while the nationalist language of this proclamation declared, “the declaration was meant to both evoke the horrors that French control had wrought on the colony and to exorcise them. It proclaimed a new Haitian national identity by focusing on the need to erase and avenge, the past of French colonialism.” (Dubois, pp.121)

 

 

References;

  1. Photo from; http://public.gettysburg.edu/
  2. Popkin, J. (2012) A Concise History of the Haitian Revolution; Wiley-Blackwell
  3. Greggus, D. (2014) The Haitian Revolution; Hackett Publishing Company
  4. Dubois, L. (2011) Haiti: The Aftershocks of History; Metropolitan Books

 

The Struggle for E-MAN-cipation

This Haitian revolution was a period of about a decade filled with fighting and havoc in the small French colony of Saint Domingue, which thrived off of a plantation economy and a large enslave labor force.

On the island, the whites were the minority with the majority; not only were the enslaved angered by this, but as well as the gens de couleur and free blacks. As stated above, Saint Domingue had a plantation economy, which was very profitable for France and very much manipulated, “on a large, well-managed sugar plantation, the work never stops. Either the ripened canes need to be cut, or a field needs replanting after being harvested, or those where the new shoots risk being strangled by weeds need to be weeded” (Geggus Doc. 4). The whites that inhabited the island needed the slave labor for profit purposes, because the money that could possibly be made on Saint Domingue was everything a person dreamed of.

Mass fear among whites spread because the possibility of riots or revolts from the enslaved, due to the large enslaved to white people proportion, much was done to repress not only the enslaved people but as well as the free blacks and the gens de couleur. Repression among the non-whites occurred because giving freedom or even rights to free blacks or the gens de couleur would have been a step in the direction towards slave emancipation.

With all the trouble that occurred in Saint Domingue, the only destination for the future Haitians was emancipation and complete separation from the French oppressors. Emancipation occurred at the time that it did because in all honestly, the thought of emancipation was finally becoming reality, “for fourteen years we have been victims of our own gullibility and tolerance, defeated not by French arms but by the pitiful eloquence of their official proclamations” (Geggus Doc. 80). Emancipation was a long time coming, since that was the final destination that the formerly enslaved, freed blacks and gen de couleur were focused on reaching.

To put it simply, emancipation in Saint Domingue occurred when it did because the French could not keep up with the revolutionaries who would have done absolutely anything for their freedom. The French were physically losing to the people of Saint Domingue, and could not keep up with what they needed to in order to be the dominant force that Napoleon needed and wanted the French forces to be in Saint Domingue. France no longer had a strong number of forces occupying Saint Domingue around the time of emancipation, because the soldiers were dying and falling ill to all the diseases that the French were not immune to on the island, “out of the 30,000 soldiers brought to the island, they only remain 18 or 20,000” (Geggus Doc. 70). With the soldiers falling ill and dying, the price the French were paying for their presence in the Atlantic on top of the price of the war with the rest of the European continent that Napoleon was invested in, was not worth it anymore. Saint Domingue was quickly becoming an economic loss, when Saint Domingue used to be a colony that once made so much money for France.

Haitian Revolution Timeline

Timeline of events leading up to, during, and after the Haitian Revolution.

With the loss of French momentum in Saint Domingue, the soon-to-be called Haitians definitely took advantage of this and were finally in their home stretch towards, what seemed to be almost impossible, emancipation. The final mark to add to why emancipation in Saint Domingue happened when it did was undoubtedly Dessalines’ Armée Indigéne that united those who were still fighting on the basis of freedom for all. Why was this army so important? Dessalines cleverly named this army to categorize the formerly enslaved, free blacks and gens de couleur as the indigenous people of Saint Domingue who were against the French, and all other whites intruding upon their potential freedom.

Emancipation in Saint Domingue was not as simple as one battle, the people who were oppressed on this island truly believed in their fight because they knew that grass was greener on the other side, but not always necessarily better. Upon reaching completely emancipation, when the revolution was all said in done, those who now lived in the newly formed colony of Haiti had much to learn, but undoubtedly used what had happened to them and their ancestors as something to stray away from. The Haitian Constitution of 1805 definitely drew upon influences from other constitutions, but made it clear to include that “no white man, regardless of his nationality, may set foot in this territory as a master or a landowner, nor will he ever be able to acquire any property.” The Haitians were being radical towards those who were once radical towards them, but the Haitian Revolution will forever stand in history as being a successful slave revolt who refused to continually be oppressed for the sake of greed from a country thousands of miles away.

Sources:

Geggus, David. The Haitian Revolution. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 2014. Ebook.

The 1805 Constitution of Haiti. Haiti, 1805. Web. http://www2.webster.edu/~corbetre/haiti/history/earlyhaiti/1805-const.htm

Timeline of Haitian Revolution. Glogster. 2010. Web. http://www.glogster.com/haeunkim/timeline/g-6lmbeh4lkr2pitgi4aamka0

The Religious Question

With an impending constitutional republic, the National Assembly of revolutionary France was charged with determining which minorities were entitled to equal rights.  Some minorities had a significantly more difficult time than others.  One area of particular debate was religion.

Should these religious minorities, many of whom were unable to freely worship in pre-revolutionary France, be permitted full citizenship?

Non-Catholics (Protestants)

Initially Protestants were denied equal rights and freedom to worship as they saw fit.  Prior to France’s Revolution, each province of France had been ruled differently, with one similarity.  Wherever one went, Protestants were discriminated against.

This discrimination extended to elections and public posts, effectively making Protestants a second class citizen.  It’s important to remember that Protestant inequality was not from a formal constitution, but rather from a monarchical decree.   Protestant’s experience with legal rights boiled down to a cycle of gaining rights through different edicts, to ultimately losing said rights, to regaining rights again from the National Assembly.

Francis I (r. 1515-1547) The King of France during the Protestant Reformation, Francis I began the persecution of Protestant minorities in France.

Francis I (r. 1515-1547) The King of France during the Protestant Reformation, Francis I began the persecution of Protestant minorities in France.

A strong argument for extending legal rights to Protestants was that, unlike Jews, practitioners of Protestant faiths were still French.  The individual still spoke French and adhered to the same social customs as other French natives.  Additionally, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen sought to provide liberty to all men, not exclusively Catholics.

Pierre Brunet de Latuque, a lawyer from the Bordeaux region of France, argued strongly in favor of incorporating rights for Protestants.  Brunet challenged, “If private interests were not constantly distorting the sovereign principles of justice, those who seek by such criminal grounds to exclude Protestants from public positions would better enter, Sirs, into the spirit and even the text of your decrees…”  Brunet continued to state that following prior decrees to the letter would severely hinder France as many qualified men were Protestant.

Calvinists

Separate from other Protestants, Calvinists faced unique challenges on their road to equality. Calvinists first gained the right to worship freely with the Edict of Nantes.  King Henry IV issued the Edict as an end to the war of religion between Catholics and Calvinists in 1598. This freedom lasted only until 1685 when Louis XIV initiated a campaign to convert all Calvinists. After 100 years of their worship being illegal, Calvinists found reprieve in 1787 through Louis XVI’s Edict of Toleration.

While Calvinists experienced a victory with the Edict of Toleration, no political rights were granted.  Furthermore, years of economic dominance in the textile industry led many French citizens to be critical of Calvinists.  Yet if the Declaration of the Rights of Man and citizens were truly the inspiration for change, then Calvinists were due rights.  Count de Clermont Tonnerre gave an impassioned speech in 1789 in defense of incorporating Calvinists (and all Protestants) into political equality.  The argument stated, “either you admit a national religion, subject all your laws to it, arm it with temporal power, exclude from your society the men who profess another creed and then, erase the article in your declaration of rights; or you permit everyone to have his own religious opinion and do not exclude from public office those who make use of this permission.”

Jews

The Jewish question in France lasted until 1791; it was then that Jews were able to celebrate freedoms guaranteed under a new constitution.  Discussions surrounding what to do with the Jewish population had persisted as remarks concerning non-Catholics did not apply to Jews, but were strictly applied to Protestants.  Struggles faced by Jews prior to 1791 were countless as the French populace sought to virtually exclude Jews from society.

Having already lived for hundreds of years as a persecuted group, the Jews in pre-revolution France were restricted from holding respectable labor positions, buying land or property, or even living among the regular population.  This created a self perpetuating issue; the lack of labor opportunities forced the Jewish people to rely on usury (money lending) as a means of providing for themselves.  Usury practices caused disdain towards the Jews.  Just as with the Protestant struggle for rights, Jews faced a battle against a Catholic majority that, for the most part, did not want Jews at all.

Unlike the Protestant (and Calvinist) minorities, the Jewish people were not viewed as French.  Judaism provided its own rules, customs, and even language that many Jews were loyal to.  The common belief stated Jews attempted to be a separate people, therefore the French constitution should allow them to be separate people.  Count de Clermont Tonnerre again made a case in defense of the persecuted minority.  According to the Count, Jews should be treated as individuals and not as a community; naturally, each individual was due the same rights as any other free man in France.

 

Bibliography:

Hunt, Lynn, ed. The French Revolution and Human Rights: A Brief Documentary History. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1996.

« Older posts